<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Must Read: How Microsoft screwed Sony</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vrworld.com/2009/01/04/a-must-read-how-microsoft-screwed-sony/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vrworld.com/2009/01/04/a-must-read-how-microsoft-screwed-sony/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 17:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre</title>
		<link>http://www.vrworld.com/2009/01/04/a-must-read-how-microsoft-screwed-sony/#comment-10177</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theovalich.wordpress.com/?p=894#comment-10177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Theo. Good luck to you. Keep up the good work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Theo. Good luck to you. Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theovalich</title>
		<link>http://www.vrworld.com/2009/01/04/a-must-read-how-microsoft-screwed-sony/#comment-10176</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[theovalich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 12:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theovalich.wordpress.com/?p=894#comment-10176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Andre,
well, I still wish all the best to the INQ, but after I had some communication with the authors there, I am somewhat doubtful. Making errors in articles and then attack a ex-colleague that explained where the error lies is sadly, not the way to go. Person in question then continued its tirade on skype with other colleagues, and let&#039;s be honest, that is not the way to deal with a problem - that comes out from mis-reading a press release. That person is not Charlie, to make things clear.
When it comes to Charlie and Nvidia, I think you should ask him. From my 2.5 years on The INQ, I saw what games nV is playing around (saw a lot of shilling from Intel and ATI as well), and after all, my 10 year history with them almost ended up in courts - I was threatened with legal action twice (discovery of cheating in 3DMark2001 and Adrianne for GeForce 8 launch). But anyways, even with all the faulty play, I&#039;ve never crossed the line myself. Company line is one, people are another.
I was also attacked by nV in the case about GeForce 8600 and bad material (neither Charlie nor I had no idea what we stumbled upon back in spring of 2007), but yet, somehow I failed to take things personally. Same went with my issues with Intel, AMD, ATI etc etc.
I&#039;ve read the 3D googles piece and sadly, consider that the article failed to deliver the right information and some errors inside the piece were irritating, especially in light of nV having demonstrations of 3D glasses in front of 50-100 people using a single emitter.
It all depends how you take on things - back in 2005, Fudo was raging all about R520 having 24 shader units, since that was the number of shaders in GF7800. My story that contained details about complete X1K line was shot down until Fudo ran a piece that confirmed 16 shaders for X1800. Only then my &quot;X1900 has 48 shaders, RV570 has 36, RV530 is 12 etc.&quot; got green light (months ahead of their launches). No hard feelings there, we both felt we have better sources. Later, Fudo had better information about Radeon 4800 series, I was in the wrong - again, no hard feelings. Are we humans, or are we dancers? ;-)
Some people had Radeon 4800 cards on their hands before both Fudo and myself, and were bragging in chats that they are going to run all the details blah blah, yet they didn&#039;t until the NDA was lifted. These people are the ones you have to worry about - all talk, no substance.
Giving judgement to something you haven&#039;t used personally is irresponsible, though. I saw my one of my former publications putting a piece about iPhone and Blackberry Storm, where Storm was criticized for earplugs equally bad as ones on the iPhone. Since Bold and Storm come with same brilliant in-ear noise-isolating ear pieces that make iPhone ones - &quot;cheap chinese rubbish&quot; - well, that didn&#039;t landed well. Why? Because the reporter didn&#039;t even saw the Storm, yet he was forced to write an opinion piece without even seeing them. Thus, I viewed that as a management fault, not the journalist. When you&#039;re editor-in-chief, you want content for the site done in a timely manner, and sometimes you go overboard, instead of creating an infrastructure where journalists can work and get information properly written.
At the end of the day, you can view business from two sides - you can take business personally and go through such amount of stress that will end up with continuous or temporary ED (just for the record, that happened to me - and I quit my job, lost 14 kilos and got calmness in my life - ironically, that happened after I quit Vidi and joined the INQ, which was much more stresfull environment - on paper.). Or, you can view job as your responsibility and be satisfied with everything that you do, even if you don&#039;t have enough time to write all that you want to write about.
Personally, I love my job. I truly enjoy in the fact that I was blessed with the ability to work the job that I love, and that job brought me to the heart of Ferrari, Mercedes, Lufthansa, Airbus and others. I traveled the world thanks to super-compressed sand and I will always have responsibility to the people that enabled me to live my life - and those people are you, my dear readers, and partners.
My company will be an interesting take on the industry, and we will see will I fail or succeed. Yes, you can expect &quot;No Marketing BS allowed&quot; sign at the front door. But I don&#039;t expect to be perfect, just enable my journalists to do their job in best possible way.
And yes, we won&#039;t put our personal opinions about individuals in front of the facts. Is a product or technology valuable to you or not - that has to be publication&#039;s mantra, being that an analyst house or a media house or whoever.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andre,<br />
well, I still wish all the best to the INQ, but after I had some communication with the authors there, I am somewhat doubtful. Making errors in articles and then attack a ex-colleague that explained where the error lies is sadly, not the way to go. Person in question then continued its tirade on skype with other colleagues, and let&#8217;s be honest, that is not the way to deal with a problem &#8211; that comes out from mis-reading a press release. That person is not Charlie, to make things clear.<br />
When it comes to Charlie and Nvidia, I think you should ask him. From my 2.5 years on The INQ, I saw what games nV is playing around (saw a lot of shilling from Intel and ATI as well), and after all, my 10 year history with them almost ended up in courts &#8211; I was threatened with legal action twice (discovery of cheating in 3DMark2001 and Adrianne for GeForce 8 launch). But anyways, even with all the faulty play, I&#8217;ve never crossed the line myself. Company line is one, people are another.<br />
I was also attacked by nV in the case about GeForce 8600 and bad material (neither Charlie nor I had no idea what we stumbled upon back in spring of 2007), but yet, somehow I failed to take things personally. Same went with my issues with Intel, AMD, ATI etc etc.<br />
I&#8217;ve read the 3D googles piece and sadly, consider that the article failed to deliver the right information and some errors inside the piece were irritating, especially in light of nV having demonstrations of 3D glasses in front of 50-100 people using a single emitter.<br />
It all depends how you take on things &#8211; back in 2005, Fudo was raging all about R520 having 24 shader units, since that was the number of shaders in GF7800. My story that contained details about complete X1K line was shot down until Fudo ran a piece that confirmed 16 shaders for X1800. Only then my &#8220;X1900 has 48 shaders, RV570 has 36, RV530 is 12 etc.&#8221; got green light (months ahead of their launches). No hard feelings there, we both felt we have better sources. Later, Fudo had better information about Radeon 4800 series, I was in the wrong &#8211; again, no hard feelings. Are we humans, or are we dancers? <img src="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=";-)" class="wp-smiley" /><br />
Some people had Radeon 4800 cards on their hands before both Fudo and myself, and were bragging in chats that they are going to run all the details blah blah, yet they didn&#8217;t until the NDA was lifted. These people are the ones you have to worry about &#8211; all talk, no substance.<br />
Giving judgement to something you haven&#8217;t used personally is irresponsible, though. I saw my one of my former publications putting a piece about iPhone and Blackberry Storm, where Storm was criticized for earplugs equally bad as ones on the iPhone. Since Bold and Storm come with same brilliant in-ear noise-isolating ear pieces that make iPhone ones &#8211; &#8220;cheap chinese rubbish&#8221; &#8211; well, that didn&#8217;t landed well. Why? Because the reporter didn&#8217;t even saw the Storm, yet he was forced to write an opinion piece without even seeing them. Thus, I viewed that as a management fault, not the journalist. When you&#8217;re editor-in-chief, you want content for the site done in a timely manner, and sometimes you go overboard, instead of creating an infrastructure where journalists can work and get information properly written.<br />
At the end of the day, you can view business from two sides &#8211; you can take business personally and go through such amount of stress that will end up with continuous or temporary ED (just for the record, that happened to me &#8211; and I quit my job, lost 14 kilos and got calmness in my life &#8211; ironically, that happened after I quit Vidi and joined the INQ, which was much more stresfull environment &#8211; on paper.). Or, you can view job as your responsibility and be satisfied with everything that you do, even if you don&#8217;t have enough time to write all that you want to write about.<br />
Personally, I love my job. I truly enjoy in the fact that I was blessed with the ability to work the job that I love, and that job brought me to the heart of Ferrari, Mercedes, Lufthansa, Airbus and others. I traveled the world thanks to super-compressed sand and I will always have responsibility to the people that enabled me to live my life &#8211; and those people are you, my dear readers, and partners.<br />
My company will be an interesting take on the industry, and we will see will I fail or succeed. Yes, you can expect &#8220;No Marketing BS allowed&#8221; sign at the front door. But I don&#8217;t expect to be perfect, just enable my journalists to do their job in best possible way.<br />
And yes, we won&#8217;t put our personal opinions about individuals in front of the facts. Is a product or technology valuable to you or not &#8211; that has to be publication&#8217;s mantra, being that an analyst house or a media house or whoever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre</title>
		<link>http://www.vrworld.com/2009/01/04/a-must-read-how-microsoft-screwed-sony/#comment-10175</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 10:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theovalich.wordpress.com/?p=894#comment-10175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought that IBM worked on the PowerPC part and sony and toshiba worked on SPE parts and then it got combined. Now I got it.

about inquirer; I started reading it 5 or 6 years ago and obviously it isn&#039;t what it used to be. After all, without you and fuad, there isn&#039;t much to read. :D

there is something I would like to ask but you don&#039;t have to answer it if you don&#039;t want to.
what is going on between charlie and nvidia? he seriously dislikes nvidia. do you know anything about it? as I said you can chose not to answer. or maybe I should ask charlie himself. :D

thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought that IBM worked on the PowerPC part and sony and toshiba worked on SPE parts and then it got combined. Now I got it.</p>
<p>about inquirer; I started reading it 5 or 6 years ago and obviously it isn&#8217;t what it used to be. After all, without you and fuad, there isn&#8217;t much to read. <img src="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
<p>there is something I would like to ask but you don&#8217;t have to answer it if you don&#8217;t want to.<br />
what is going on between charlie and nvidia? he seriously dislikes nvidia. do you know anything about it? as I said you can chose not to answer. or maybe I should ask charlie himself. <img src="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theovalich</title>
		<link>http://www.vrworld.com/2009/01/04/a-must-read-how-microsoft-screwed-sony/#comment-10174</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[theovalich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 10:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theovalich.wordpress.com/?p=894#comment-10174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[well, not sure it has everything to do with &quot;super fast memory&quot;... rather how you deal with the chip internally. Nv doesn&#039;t have fixed-function AA hw in GT200, ATI put dedicated FF in 4800 and we all saw the difference... compare 8xAA at 1680x1050 on GTX260/280 and 4850/4870, and that comparison shows how good dedicated hw is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, not sure it has everything to do with &#8220;super fast memory&#8221;&#8230; rather how you deal with the chip internally. Nv doesn&#8217;t have fixed-function AA hw in GT200, ATI put dedicated FF in 4800 and we all saw the difference&#8230; compare 8xAA at 1680&#215;1050 on GTX260/280 and 4850/4870, and that comparison shows how good dedicated hw is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrzej Bania</title>
		<link>http://www.vrworld.com/2009/01/04/a-must-read-how-microsoft-screwed-sony/#comment-10173</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrzej Bania]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 10:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theovalich.wordpress.com/?p=894#comment-10173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...there&#039;s probably an interesting question to be asked about the amount of &#039;super fast memory&#039; you need to be able to implement AA with no cost - especially as the world moves toward HD gaming around 1080p ;~)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;there&#8217;s probably an interesting question to be asked about the amount of &#8216;super fast memory&#8217; you need to be able to implement AA with no cost &#8211; especially as the world moves toward HD gaming around 1080p ;~)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garacs</title>
		<link>http://www.vrworld.com/2009/01/04/a-must-read-how-microsoft-screwed-sony/#comment-10172</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garacs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 08:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theovalich.wordpress.com/?p=894#comment-10172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the infamous RROD... Geez we just bought an XboX360 for our kid! and right after I read for the first time of the RROD! If I oculd have learnt it before...

The console is working fine, for the moment. I hope nothing happens.

As per the book: I&#039;ll try to find it on German Amazon, and consider it as a personal (from me to myself) late X-Mas gift. Really looks like an interesting read as you put it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the infamous RROD&#8230; Geez we just bought an XboX360 for our kid! and right after I read for the first time of the RROD! If I oculd have learnt it before&#8230;</p>
<p>The console is working fine, for the moment. I hope nothing happens.</p>
<p>As per the book: I&#8217;ll try to find it on German Amazon, and consider it as a personal (from me to myself) late X-Mas gift. Really looks like an interesting read as you put it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theo Valich</title>
		<link>http://www.vrworld.com/2009/01/04/a-must-read-how-microsoft-screwed-sony/#comment-10171</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Theo Valich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 23:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theovalich.wordpress.com/?p=894#comment-10171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RE: Andrzej - well, I think that book is worth the read, and then you can see how MSFT screwed the pooch.

There is nothing wrong with TSMC working, or there is nothing wrong with ATI/AMD designing a standard and then giving it to all to use.

But to take a CPU that is in development, give it to competitor, cut all the SPE&#039;s and Rambus references, copy it three times and offer as a new product before the first one is out the door is really... well, the authors of the book have right to their opinion. And just by some case, I agree with them.

Then again, even that didn&#039;t help MSFT, since they screwed majorly in the design stages... a source of mine is writing a book about the RROD and the fact that Microsoft knew about it. Will that end in a class-action suit? God only knows... all I know is that MSFT knew that the consoles will have &quot;higher than acceptable percentage of faulty consoles&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: Andrzej &#8211; well, I think that book is worth the read, and then you can see how MSFT screwed the pooch.</p>
<p>There is nothing wrong with TSMC working, or there is nothing wrong with ATI/AMD designing a standard and then giving it to all to use.</p>
<p>But to take a CPU that is in development, give it to competitor, cut all the SPE&#8217;s and Rambus references, copy it three times and offer as a new product before the first one is out the door is really&#8230; well, the authors of the book have right to their opinion. And just by some case, I agree with them.</p>
<p>Then again, even that didn&#8217;t help MSFT, since they screwed majorly in the design stages&#8230; a source of mine is writing a book about the RROD and the fact that Microsoft knew about it. Will that end in a class-action suit? God only knows&#8230; all I know is that MSFT knew that the consoles will have &#8220;higher than acceptable percentage of faulty consoles&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theo Valich</title>
		<link>http://www.vrworld.com/2009/01/04/a-must-read-how-microsoft-screwed-sony/#comment-10170</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Theo Valich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 23:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theovalich.wordpress.com/?p=894#comment-10170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RE: Andre
Hi Andre, well, the story is never that simple. PowerPC core is not the same PowerPC core, just like Pentium 2 has nothing to do with Core 2 (they use the same instruction set and that&#039;s about that - one is a CISC, one is a RISC-translating-into-CISC).
When you read about AMD and Intel and their processors, underlying commonality is the instruction set, but that&#039;s about that.
Even better example would be ATI and nV... they both support DX10 and OGL, but they operate in completely different architectures.
PowerPC inside Cell is not the G4 or G5 processor, but sure as heck is not the same core as Power6... it is a custom built core between IBM, Sony and Toshiba - and full name is STI Cell anyways, not IBM Cell.

On a personal note, I used to work at Tom&#039;s Hardware and TG Daily after I left INQ. As you can see by INQ today, it is in a state that was lead to by its bosses, who got fired and replaced in the process. I had the idea of increasing the quality of the site with a project INQ 2.0, and the goal of the project was to increase revenue for The INQ by implementing latest technologies. Well, that plan got shot down and long story short, I left the company because of a better offer and moved to US.

I wish INQ all the best, but that site is now a shadow of its former self... at the time when Charlie, Nova, Fudo and I were there in full speed, you had variety, now in most cases, you have senseless bashing of one side and glorifying another.
Personally, I am a member of IFJ and RWB and I do go by journalist code of objective reporting, looking from all sides before giving my PoV.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: Andre<br />
Hi Andre, well, the story is never that simple. PowerPC core is not the same PowerPC core, just like Pentium 2 has nothing to do with Core 2 (they use the same instruction set and that&#8217;s about that &#8211; one is a CISC, one is a RISC-translating-into-CISC).<br />
When you read about AMD and Intel and their processors, underlying commonality is the instruction set, but that&#8217;s about that.<br />
Even better example would be ATI and nV&#8230; they both support DX10 and OGL, but they operate in completely different architectures.<br />
PowerPC inside Cell is not the G4 or G5 processor, but sure as heck is not the same core as Power6&#8230; it is a custom built core between IBM, Sony and Toshiba &#8211; and full name is STI Cell anyways, not IBM Cell.</p>
<p>On a personal note, I used to work at Tom&#8217;s Hardware and TG Daily after I left INQ. As you can see by INQ today, it is in a state that was lead to by its bosses, who got fired and replaced in the process. I had the idea of increasing the quality of the site with a project INQ 2.0, and the goal of the project was to increase revenue for The INQ by implementing latest technologies. Well, that plan got shot down and long story short, I left the company because of a better offer and moved to US.</p>
<p>I wish INQ all the best, but that site is now a shadow of its former self&#8230; at the time when Charlie, Nova, Fudo and I were there in full speed, you had variety, now in most cases, you have senseless bashing of one side and glorifying another.<br />
Personally, I am a member of IFJ and RWB and I do go by journalist code of objective reporting, looking from all sides before giving my PoV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrzej Bania</title>
		<link>http://www.vrworld.com/2009/01/04/a-must-read-how-microsoft-screwed-sony/#comment-10169</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrzej Bania]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 21:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theovalich.wordpress.com/?p=894#comment-10169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This kind of thing happens all the time , but it is not necessarily a &#039;contamination&#039; thing.

Let&#039;s say that ATI (chips to be found in the XBox360) move to a new process ahead of their rivals...

...and those chips are made at TSMC...

...who manage to improve their processes and learn &#039;generically useful stuff&#039; with that move...

...which then benefits nVidia (chips to be found in the PS3)

No one says that there is &#039;contamination&#039;, TSMC&#039;s reputation is impeccable, and yet there can be no doubt that the company that goes &#039;second&#039; will have an advantage

Considering the effort Sony puts into the contracts it signs with music artists etc, it is pretty poor for to &#039;break down weeping for them because they may not have had enough legal expertise available when creating their contracts&#039;

This happens all the time, in multiple industries

If you choose to &#039;go first&#039; - with ANYTHING - then you can be almost certain that your competitors will benefit one way or another

e.g. Theo analyses the global IT market, lesser press read the article and use it as a &#039;starting point&#039; for their own &#039;original work&#039; - happens all the time and twice on Sundays :~)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This kind of thing happens all the time , but it is not necessarily a &#8216;contamination&#8217; thing.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s say that ATI (chips to be found in the XBox360) move to a new process ahead of their rivals&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;and those chips are made at TSMC&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;who manage to improve their processes and learn &#8216;generically useful stuff&#8217; with that move&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;which then benefits nVidia (chips to be found in the PS3)</p>
<p>No one says that there is &#8216;contamination&#8217;, TSMC&#8217;s reputation is impeccable, and yet there can be no doubt that the company that goes &#8216;second&#8217; will have an advantage</p>
<p>Considering the effort Sony puts into the contracts it signs with music artists etc, it is pretty poor for to &#8216;break down weeping for them because they may not have had enough legal expertise available when creating their contracts&#8217;</p>
<p>This happens all the time, in multiple industries</p>
<p>If you choose to &#8216;go first&#8217; &#8211; with ANYTHING &#8211; then you can be almost certain that your competitors will benefit one way or another</p>
<p>e.g. Theo analyses the global IT market, lesser press read the article and use it as a &#8216;starting point&#8217; for their own &#8216;original work&#8217; &#8211; happens all the time and twice on Sundays :~)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre</title>
		<link>http://www.vrworld.com/2009/01/04/a-must-read-how-microsoft-screwed-sony/#comment-10168</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 16:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theovalich.wordpress.com/?p=894#comment-10168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by the way, i know you from the days of writing for inquirer. what happend? why you left? was it charlie?  :)) :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by the way, i know you from the days of writing for inquirer. what happend? why you left? was it charlie?  :)) <img src="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre</title>
		<link>http://www.vrworld.com/2009/01/04/a-must-read-how-microsoft-screwed-sony/#comment-10167</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 16:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theovalich.wordpress.com/?p=894#comment-10167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[xbox 360 has a triple core, IBM power processor and, and as we all know power processor is an all IBM design. so what gives?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>xbox 360 has a triple core, IBM power processor and, and as we all know power processor is an all IBM design. so what gives?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cdn.vrworld.com

 Served from: www.vrworld.com @ 2015-04-10 15:07:46 by W3 Total Cache -->