<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>VR World &#187; Hulu</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vrworld.com/tag/hulu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vrworld.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 07:54:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Amazon Fire TV Stick is a $39 Chromecast Challenger</title>
		<link>http://www.vrworld.com/2014/10/27/amazon-fire-tv-stick-39-chromecast-challenger/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vrworld.com/2014/10/27/amazon-fire-tv-stick-39-chromecast-challenger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 18:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anshel Sag]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloud Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon Fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chromecast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fire Phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fire Stick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fire TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fire TV Stick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hulu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netflix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prime Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brightsideofnews.com/?p=40640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Amazon has just released the Fire TV Stick, which is Amazon's answer to Google's Chromecast, with supposedly better hardware and content availability</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com/2014/10/27/amazon-fire-tv-stick-39-chromecast-challenger/">Amazon Fire TV Stick is a $39 Chromecast Challenger</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com">VR World</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="980" height="600" src="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/AmazonStreamingStick.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="Amazon Fire TV Stick" /></p><p>Amazon (<a href="https://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ:AMZN" target="_blank">NASDAQ:AMZN</a>) has quietly been working on a competitor to <a href="http://www.google.com/chrome/devices/chromecast/" target="_blank">Google&#8217;s Chromecast</a> which is essentially a self-contained streaming stick which allows you to turn any &#8216;dumb&#8217; TV into a smart TV with a simple Wi-Fi-enabled HDMI dongle. The Chromecast has been around for quite some time and now sells for $35. It allows you to stream from your laptop, desktop or smartphone to display on to your TV and to send content from your devices to your TV via the Chromecast. The Chromecast connects to your Wi-Fi network and uses it as an intermediary between all of your devices that wish to serve it content. Currently, <a href="http://www.google.com/chrome/devices/chromecast/apps.html" target="_blank">it supports a few dozen applications</a> with the most important ones being Chrome (obviously), YouTube, Pandora, Hulu, Netflix, and <a href="https://plex.tv/" target="_blank">Plex</a>.</p>
<div id="attachment_40655" style="width: 510px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/m-slate-01-lg-novid._V322539678_.jpg" rel="lightbox-0"><img class="size-full wp-image-40655" src="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/m-slate-01-lg-novid._V322539678_.jpg" alt="Fire TV Stick Content" width="500" height="483" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Fire TV Stick Content</p></div>
<p>And now, Amazon is once again challenging Google directly  (like they did with the Fire TV, Fire Tablets and Fire Phone) with the Fire TV Stick. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Amazon-W87CUN-Fire-TV-Stick" target="_blank">The Fire TV Stick</a> is quite plain and simply Amazon&#8217;s own beefed up version of a Chromecast with what they claim to be double the RAM and an improved MIMO antenna which enables a stronger Wi-Fi signal and potentially better speeds.  Amazon also touts that the Fire TV Stick has over 200 games available to it already, as well as a compatible game controller, which neither the Chromecast nor the Roku streaming sticks have as options. The real key with the Amazon Fire TV Stick is that it has Amazon&#8217;s Prime Video service available to it, which the Chromecast does not, however the Chromecast has <a href="http://www.hbogo.com/" target="_blank">HBOGo</a> functionality, which the Amazon Fire TV Stick does not. And with HBO saying that they plan to offer HBO as a subscription service without cable service, there&#8217;s a very good chance that having HBOGo could be incredibly valuable.</p>
<div id="attachment_40656" style="width: 510px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/m-slate-05-lg._V322539674_.jpg" rel="lightbox-1"><img class="size-full wp-image-40656" src="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/m-slate-05-lg._V322539674_.jpg" alt="Amazon Fire TV Stick Hand" width="500" height="483" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Amazon Fire TV Stick Hand</p></div>
<p>There&#8217;s no denying that Amazon&#8217;s offering seems quite good, especially since Google&#8217;s Chromecast still does not have that many applications available to it and they are both relatively the same price. The biggest problem Amazon will have with the Fire TV Stick will be getting consumers to understand what it can and can&#8217;t do and selling their performance and gaming ability as a benefit over Google&#8217;s Chromecast. After all, they don&#8217;t want to turn the Fire TV Stick into another Fire Phone where they overprice the device and oversell its abilities and then thousands of them go unsold and they have to take hundreds of millions of dollars of losses on it.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com/2014/10/27/amazon-fire-tv-stick-39-chromecast-challenger/">Amazon Fire TV Stick is a $39 Chromecast Challenger</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com">VR World</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vrworld.com/2014/10/27/amazon-fire-tv-stick-39-chromecast-challenger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Live TV Viewing Out Weighs Streaming Video</title>
		<link>http://www.vrworld.com/2014/04/22/live-tv-viewing-weighs-streaming-video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vrworld.com/2014/04/22/live-tv-viewing-weighs-streaming-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 06:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darleen Hartley]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Download]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hulu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ipsos OTX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netflix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torrent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV viewing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viewer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viewers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viewing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brightsideofnews.com/?p=34680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Ipsos OTX, a research and social strategy company, says sitting in front of the TV is still the preferred viewing experience. Eighty six percent of ...</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com/2014/04/22/live-tv-viewing-weighs-streaming-video/">Live TV Viewing Out Weighs Streaming Video</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com">VR World</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="650" height="366" src="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Watching-TV_6501.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="Watching TV" /></p><p><a href="http://www.ipsos.com/" target="_blank">Ipsos OTX</a>, a research and social strategy company, says sitting in front of the TV is still the preferred viewing experience. Eighty six percent of adults out of 15,551 in 20 countries are traditional couch potatoes.</p>
<p>According to their statistics, several respondents admitted to accessing video in multiple ways. The company quotes 27 percent as streaming/downloading TV/video via computer, 16 percent streaming Internet video to TV, 16 percent are using DVR/recording devices to view video entertainment, and only 1710 in 15.5 thousand watching on mobile.</p>
<p>Depending on the method of watching entertainment, the results resemble a roller coaster, up and down depending on the modality.</p>
<p>As expected, viewing methods vary according to age group. Seniors between 50 and 91 years old rarely watch on any unit other than live TV. Middle aged folks between 35-49 are ranked at 88 percent while the younger, under-35 crowd, prefer more technological methods of viewing.</p>
<p>In contrast, and as expected, the last group has the highest use of newer modes of watching via computer/laptops. Seniors drop to 17 percent in this category. Streaming from the Internet follows a similar pattern with under 35’s at 20 percent and the next two groups dropping below that. Those 50-64 are minimal users registering only 5 percent.</p>
<p>The least used mode of viewing video is the DVR or similar recording device, but here seniors are at the top of the list. Obviously they are having to save those late, late shows that run after they are all nestled snug in their beds for viewing at a more convenient time.</p>
<p>Since this is a <a href="%20http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/223761/most-tv-viewing-still-live-but-streaming-video-g.html" target="_blank">worldwide set of statistics</a> it is difficult to quantity what is really going on in any given circumstance or group. However, statistics are always interesting … aren’t they?</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com/2014/04/22/live-tv-viewing-weighs-streaming-video/">Live TV Viewing Out Weighs Streaming Video</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com">VR World</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vrworld.com/2014/04/22/live-tv-viewing-weighs-streaming-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cdn.vrworld.com

 Served from: www.vrworld.com @ 2015-04-10 17:21:44 by W3 Total Cache -->