<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>VR World &#187; human eye</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vrworld.com/tag/human-eye/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vrworld.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 07:54:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s official: Digital sensor overtakes the human eye(s)</title>
		<link>http://www.vrworld.com/2008/12/20/its-official-digital-sensor-overtakes-the-human-eyes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vrworld.com/2008/12/20/its-official-digital-sensor-overtakes-the-human-eyes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 16:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Theo Valich]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[262 Mpixel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMOS Sensor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eye resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human eye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human eye resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human eyes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megapixel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mpixel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mysterium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mysterium Monstro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RED 617]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RED One]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theovalich.wordpress.com/?p=860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Can a digital component offer higher resolution than the human eye? Upcoming Mysterium Monstro RED 617 sensor features higher resolution than both human eyes, not just one.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com/2008/12/20/its-official-digital-sensor-overtakes-the-human-eyes/">It&#8217;s official: Digital sensor overtakes the human eye(s)</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com">VR World</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the popularization of digital cameras, we witnessed numerous discussions about the precision of human eye e.g. how many &#8220;megapixels&#8221; a human eye has? There are several answers on-line, but general consensus is that a single human eye has between 105 and 126 million rods and cones, e.g. &#8220;126 MPixels&#8221;. This number was extremely impressive at the time when most digital cameras had 1.3 MPixels, and still is impressive, with the world&#8217;s consumer cameras passing the 10 million barrier.</p>
<p>But, RED is the company that intends to do things differently. <a href="http://theovalich.wordpress.com/2008/11/14/red-launches-3d-and-261-mpixel-cameras-revolutionizes-cinema-production-forever/" target="_blank">A while ago, I wrote a small piece announcing the revolution of digital cinema</a> and digital photography in general &#8211; <a href="http://reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=23112" target="_blank">RED introducing their &#8220;double o&#8221; (Obsolescence Obsolete) concept</a>.<br />
At the top of the future line-up stands RED 617, powered by single CMOS sensor in &#8220;beyond huge&#8221; category (9744mm2). What didn&#8217;t made the news then was the fact that this single CMOS sensor actually features a higher resolution than human eye… both of them. According to Jim Jannard, founder of RED, <a href="http://reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=23918" target="_blank">RED 617 Mysterium Monstro features 261,352,000 pixels, while both human eyes feature 252 million rods/cones</a>. In short &#8211; RED 617 has 135 million pixels more than a single human eyes.</p>
<div id="attachment_861" style="width: 510px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img class="size-full wp-image-861" title="red_mysteriummonstro-671" src="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/red_mysteriummonstro-671.jpg" alt="Is this the first sensor to offer higher resolution than the human eye? Believe it or not, but the answer is yes." width="500" height="603" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Is this the first sensor to offer higher resolution than the human eye? Believe it or not, but the answer is yes.</p></div>
<p>Thus, digital will overtake analog in 2009, when RED 617-powered cameras debut. Just one small disclaimer for the end: this story is about optical resolution &#8211; if you want to discuss fidelity, that&#8217;s the field of infinites for the human eye, so we won&#8217;t go there ;-Can a di</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com/2008/12/20/its-official-digital-sensor-overtakes-the-human-eyes/">It&#8217;s official: Digital sensor overtakes the human eye(s)</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com">VR World</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vrworld.com/2008/12/20/its-official-digital-sensor-overtakes-the-human-eyes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cdn.vrworld.com

 Served from: www.vrworld.com @ 2015-04-10 17:22:44 by W3 Total Cache -->