<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>VR World &#187; Intel Core i7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vrworld.com/tag/intel-core-i7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vrworld.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 07:54:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Devil&#039;s Canyon Reviewed</title>
		<link>http://www.vrworld.com/2014/08/07/deils-canyon-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vrworld.com/2014/08/07/deils-canyon-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 16:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VR World Staff]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Core i7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Core i7 4790K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Devil's Canyon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel Core i7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brightsideofnews.com/?p=37214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Devil&#8217;s Canyon, Intel’s new K – SKU Haswell chips have arrived. The 4690K and 4790K are the new chips that have four cores running at ...</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com/2014/08/07/deils-canyon-review/">Devil&#039;s Canyon Reviewed</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com">VR World</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="500" height="500" src="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Devils-Canyon-front.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="Devil&#039;s Canyone - top" /></p><p>Devil&#8217;s Canyon, Intel’s new K – SKU Haswell chips have arrived.</p>
<p>The 4690K and 4790K are the new chips that have four cores running at 4GHz (with 4.4GHz Turbo / 4.5 Max single core Turbo). These were created with the goal of being able to provide higher clocks stably so there are new features that have been added to these chips. There are added capacitors and beefed up power delivery design with these CPUs.</p>
<p>One of the much talked about new features is the reworked TIM called Next-Generation Polymer Thermal Interface Material (NGPTIM). With the enhanced specs of Haswell comes a higher Wattage spec for these chips as well, now at 88W (4790K) up from 84W (4770K). The Z97 is spec-<span id="503de82a-861c-4acf-9dd7-719d3b85b96f" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="f7ed2655-8bc5-4d41-b1ca-937427db391a" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="63888bd4-0793-4b9c-b7b9-0455f90c0032" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="7e6ce37f-e7f0-4916-a57e-dad4b0e10fde" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="3468545d-f9cd-48ef-a356-bdbc078cf8d0" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark">ed</span></span></span></span></span> for these chip’s higher wattage, and they were initially only going to be allowed on the Z97 boards. Intel did change their mind before release and will allow companies to add in support for these chips to some of its current Z87 boards. This will likely require a BIOS update and limited support to the beefier z87 boards that can handle the expected loads.</p>
<p><a href="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Devils-Canyon-back.jpg" rel="lightbox-0"><img class="aligncenter wp-image-37227 size-full" src="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Devils-Canyon-back.jpg" alt="Devil's Canyone - underside" width="500" height="500" /></a></p>
<p>Testing of the 4790K ES was done with the MSI Z97 MPOWER MAX AC (watch for the review coming up), with a closed water-cooling loop Asetek design from Thermaltake that has a dual 120mm fan radiator. The benchmarks will show the highest speed the benchmark was able to run and remain stable at.</p>
<p>Devil&#8217;s Canyon Testing Platform:</p>
<ul>
<li>Intel 4790K ES</li>
<li>MSI MPOWER MAX AC</li>
<li>MSI R9 290X LIGHTNING</li>
<li>Team Vulcan DDR3 2400 11-13-13-35 2x8G</li>
<li>Mushkin Chronos 240GB SSD</li>
<li>Silverstone Strider 1KW PSU</li>
<li>Thermaltake Water 3.0 Extreme</li>
<li>Win7 Ultimate 64-bit</li>
</ul>
<p>After hours of tinkering and the failure to attain the goal of 5GHz which had been set, I found a very solid clock speed of 4.7GHz (47&#215;100), at 1.29v. It was clear that quality cooling this processor is priority number one for anyone expecting to run one with stability. Going above 4.7GHz required substantial voltage bumps for each small jump in speed. Though 5GHz and slightly above was possible with the same cooling setup, it was only stable enough for the single threaded benchmark load. The increased voltage made it very touchy with stability under load. I settled in with 4.7GHz as I was able to run the speed with low voltage and was solid.</p>
<h2>Benchmarks</h2>
<p>At 4.7GHz paired with DDR3 2400 RAM this is a formidable system for sure. It is an absolute beast in gaming benchmarks as well as productivity benchmarks.</p>
<p><strong>3DMARK Firestrike Overall</strong></p>
<p>(Higher is better)</p>
<p><a href="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/3DMARK.jpg" rel="lightbox-1"><img class="aligncenter wp-image-37223 size-full" src="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/3DMARK.jpg" alt="3DMARK" width="481" height="289" /></a></p>
<p>You can see that the scores do go up incrementally with the CPU speed increases, although not drastically in the overall scores. This shows that the CPU scores are very heavily outweighed by GPU performance in overall results</p>
<p><strong><span id="aecb7345-efec-4896-bc11-7f30d4dc8a3e" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="17ec0f18-7faf-4f3a-807a-9d22553693df" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="6d8ceb6c-970c-4aea-b17a-d3e9a166d93e" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="63c02c83-cc4d-4e3b-97f4-3167a12c153f" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="4a3ef7c5-78b3-47be-8c61-5ee015ec7594" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark">Firestrike</span></span></span></span></span> Standard</strong></p>
<p>(Higher is better)</p>
<p><a href="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/3DMARK-Standard.jpg" rel="lightbox-2"><img class="aligncenter wp-image-37222 size-full" src="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/3DMARK-Standard.jpg" alt="3DMARK - Standard" width="481" height="289" /></a></p>
<p>The scaling of the physics score is in line with what can be expected. You can see the gain that can come with a decent <span id="14254595-691e-42ff-8f09-d9e7f4c0f539" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="9116570d-2ad4-431b-bdc0-16fb8ce7345d" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="8a6f8af6-2e80-4492-b747-fd4b9d893bfb" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="8b8bbab6-3782-43c2-871f-8f564579173b" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="11f52d48-8668-4c87-aa94-cc14dfbdd47d" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark">overclock</span></span></span></span></span> on the 4790K.</p>
<p><strong><span id="0fb640a9-eae1-470e-aa31-a2ef7f2055ce" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="43e29147-792f-40b8-9fec-186502c2a8ff" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="bc24be77-1a9d-4ceb-86f0-64c2230965c7" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="1a349652-ff04-4c33-9ffc-8c0b21efc5c6" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="8ad4f371-5d9b-49b2-aa21-1b881ddae53e" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark">Firestrike</span></span></span></span></span> Extreme</strong></p>
<p>(Higher is better)</p>
<p><a href="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/3DMARK-EXTREME.jpg" rel="lightbox-3"><img class="size-full wp-image-37221 aligncenter" src="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/3DMARK-EXTREME.jpg" alt="3DMARK - EXTREME" width="463" height="396" /></a></p>
<p>Again the scaling is in line with what you would expect on the Extreme test.</p>
<p><strong>PCMARK 8</strong></p>
<p>(Higher is better)</p>
<p><a href="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/PCMARK-81.jpg" rel="lightbox-4"><img class="size-full wp-image-37226 aligncenter" src="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/PCMARK-81.jpg" alt="PCMARK 8" width="481" height="289" /></a></p>
<p>There is fairly uniform scaling across all three benchmarks that were done.</p>
<p><strong><span id="43de39ba-74de-4f0c-86ef-b33d1e084354" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="d81ff9df-2e0e-48f2-8e48-939b0ef34c72" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="e9f3982f-2894-4a52-b855-f91408902e5d" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="c03493b1-9fc3-4d83-a10f-35a67449f771" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="80be8f26-33d5-4e7a-b480-2e25f4a602a7" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark">Cinebench</span></span></span></span></span> r11<span id="bda6cb8f-b3f6-496b-aeb2-d805bda449a8" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="fed9d58e-9586-4181-9901-6f813797923e" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="7d88151c-00f2-4969-b4bd-576394cc5e5d" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="e60ddb77-87bc-4d8b-92e4-4cee737f71fa" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="3e6f6ab9-61dc-41f2-bd46-1d7fe3b240c6" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark">.</span></span></span></span></span>5</strong></p>
<p>(Higher is better)</p>
<p><a href="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Cinebench-r11.5.jpg" rel="lightbox-5"><img class="size-full wp-image-37225 aligncenter" src="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Cinebench-r11.5.jpg" alt="Cinebench r11.5" width="481" height="289" /></a></p>
<p><span id="5a2cb9db-3e5e-4c80-b02c-209294761533" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="d640eaf2-d62e-41fe-a791-0e2fecb3a5c9" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark">Cinebench</span></span> performance was good and it scales nicely with the frequency increase.</p>
<p><strong>AIDA64 Memory Benchmark</strong></p>
<p>(Higher is better)</p>
<p><a href="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/AIDA64-CACHE-MEMORY-BENCHMARK.jpg" rel="lightbox-6"><img class="size-full wp-image-37224 aligncenter" src="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/AIDA64-CACHE-MEMORY-BENCHMARK.jpg" alt="AIDA64 CACHE &amp; MEMORY BENCHMARK" width="481" height="289" /></a></p>
<p>As you can see the numbers are about the same across the board with the memory at 2400 at all speeds. The numbers are especially strong and are even rivaling a quad channel setup.</p>
<p>Looking <span id="2c9c73c3-fff8-4d3a-8797-a5d945805b67" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="9138485d-db8c-4307-8a84-9cce1b65395a" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="df55fb65-e24d-4531-83dd-6e13fd110ea0" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="f199c228-cee9-44a0-835e-0902d3502cd4" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="a7620a0c-2976-496b-bd0f-b5bccbb8b8a3" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark">back I</span></span></span></span></span> am extremely happy with my clock of 4.7 GHz achieved with this chip. Being very stable at this speed, paired with the very nice bandwidth of the RAM will be ideal. If the retail version holds true to these ES chips there is no doubt you will see many people running these up to 5GHz. It is going to be interesting as it will be harder on the cooling under load, we will likely be seeing people running fairly high voltages.</p>
<h2>What&#8217;s not to like?</h2>
<p>The disappointing thing is that these are really no better than the previous <span id="6a65f491-9640-4c19-b596-7936872cba8e" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="eaa6e355-ed24-40fe-afa2-005b3106da4c" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="86678beb-d9e1-427a-a1eb-8d122d7fb726" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="917e5632-6053-4b44-89c6-6544a01f4ff2" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="c353b6fe-aeaf-4f78-b430-a4d967717f61" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark">gen</span></span></span></span></span> standard Haswell K SKUs. They are just as random with the <span id="7a9e104d-7507-45a8-8ca0-39d3929f94e4" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="43c24085-8649-4403-83c0-cad7d3ea183a" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="0ea20c9c-1df7-4e4b-9235-78286906babc" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="cf2881e4-6a2a-424d-93cb-1e034f7c1232" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="3b11b10e-867d-4af7-a144-31b766af751f" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark">overclock</span></span></span></span></span> ability, it is hit or miss and it’s unfortunate that with these new adjustments to the “sauce” that we don’t see the majority of them surpassing 4.6 GHz with ease.</p>
<p>This is very apparent when looking at <span id="356c4e14-8355-45f0-9493-bee0292b95d4" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="658a77b8-1940-4646-a163-e466345abbae" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="a9e99d21-0d91-48de-9d1a-be8e2a6e6711" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="021f4ca8-292e-467c-b27a-74076126e51c" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="744d88d4-a441-4622-8483-f995470303b8" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark">overclockers</span></span></span></span></span> who test many CPUs looking for their ideal piece of hardware. Many who might test 10+ different CPUs are reporting that the results are all over the place and you don’t really see a tight average grouping of their tests. I noticed that I wasn’t getting a boost in memory clocking with the Devil’s Canyon as well.</p>
<p>The furthest I was able to push it with my previous Haswell (4670K ES) was about 2.8 GHz, I find I am topping out there as well. Though I don’t have <span id="40a73c83-eb8f-40cb-b1eb-cbc597ee7d23" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="64ab2e94-245f-4449-9350-394b86184d83" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="5d98c1b9-f0bb-42e7-bae3-0c2e7dc86b76" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="76686857-663d-4bbe-a279-e49abdca23a2" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="309f1bdc-5212-4208-9a72-335c1aff5bf6" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark">some</span></span></span></span></span> kits to push even further I can say that the RAM <span id="fcd545aa-47bd-4e0b-906e-e3b38b583088" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="624de0b4-b312-4edc-a636-0fa30509560a" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="291592ff-aaed-4884-8f0b-0a146d5b6b0c" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="e650f3c6-9ddb-4cd6-bd7b-b947ac755db7" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="c5fe3f1c-b3b8-4625-8c4b-668e9ff60210" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark">overclocking</span></span></span></span></span> is good. Unfortunately, I am finding that I am hitting the wall of my memory kit and can push no further. As someone who is looking to get back into extreme <span id="fa039282-618c-409c-833c-8c8753f2eb71" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="fb92a8bc-4f69-4758-b1fa-e96b719b9774" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="b2921b2d-d39e-435e-ae22-84a2eca3fd8f" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="059f14c9-a3ca-41d8-a1dc-8f4f2c431ccf" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="d85ceace-4676-4af1-b000-d2bf31bd94e2" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark">overclocking</span></span></span></span></span> I am personally finding this disheartening, I will have a tough time to find my ideal piece.</p>
<h2>Is it worth a buy?</h2>
<p>Would I buy a 4690K or a 4790K?  I would buy one as a CPU for a new system, but not as a replacement for 4670K/4770K.  If you are looking to build a new system, definitely that the 4690K or 4790K will be a great addition to the <span id="c8fd5b23-66bd-4937-9147-7e801906d1e2" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="c9d87bb1-97f7-4519-9254-49bf0383ae95" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="aa780af9-4b77-4bdf-a112-108313106fad" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="59d33256-ebee-481e-a5ea-02670cb7a810" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="02b60828-b8c1-4999-adfe-ccd5a9f2b0c5" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark">build</span></span></span></span></span>. I would take it over the older 4670K or 4770K as it has definitely been an improvement over those, even if it isn’t a huge one.</p>
<p>I do not suggest that you upgrade from the one of the previous Haswell K CPUs. I think that spending the money to upgrade with the possibility of little or no improvement wouldn’t be worth it. So at the end my main thought is that it is a nice improvement and a great CPU, but not worth the upgrade from 4670K or 4790K. I look forward to what Intel’s engineers come up for us <span id="cf7c97d2-d7d7-4a63-84c8-606c935de664" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="55778487-2c44-4bb7-a90c-471cae9d6225" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="d84ad5be-a29d-467d-9114-04b32f81f6d3" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="a20d8950-907b-405b-81d1-ede81d2061f8" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"><span id="379f41b2-8be2-4bc6-b1d3-298844edb828" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark">overclockers</span></span></span></span></span> next.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com/2014/08/07/deils-canyon-review/">Devil&#039;s Canyon Reviewed</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com">VR World</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vrworld.com/2014/08/07/deils-canyon-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel Unleashes Devil&#039;s Canyon, Boosts the Desktop</title>
		<link>http://www.vrworld.com/2014/06/02/intel-unleashes-devils-canyon-boosts-desktop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vrworld.com/2014/06/02/intel-unleashes-devils-canyon-boosts-desktop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 06:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anshel Sag]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Core i7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Core i7 4790K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Devil's Canyon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel Core i7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel Pentium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGPTIM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overclock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overclocking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentium Anniversary Edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resistor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thermal Interface Material]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TIM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brightsideofnews.com/?p=35564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Intel has made it quite clear that they are dead set on reviving the PC market, especially from the high performance desktop point of view. ...</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com/2014/06/02/intel-unleashes-devils-canyon-boosts-desktop/">Intel Unleashes Devil&#039;s Canyon, Boosts the Desktop</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com">VR World</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="980" height="647" src="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/IntelSemi_9801.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="IntelSemi_980" /></p><p>Intel has made it quite clear that they are dead set on reviving the PC market, especially from the high performance desktop point of view. They are showing their commitment to that vision today with the announcement of their new Devil&#8217;s Canyon refresh to the <a href="http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/core/4th-gen-core-processor-family.html" target="_blank">Haswell CPUs that they had launched last year</a>. These new Devil&#8217;s Canyon CPUs are designed to accompany the company&#8217;s newly launched Z97 chipset, which adds a few minor features to the already existing Z87 chipset that Haswell had launched with. In fact, <a title="Gigabyte Introduces New 9 Series Z97 Motherboards" href="http://www.brightsideofnews.com/2014/06/02/gigabyte-introduces-new-9-series-z97-motherboards/" target="_blank">Gigabyte launched their full Z97 line of motherboards</a> yesterday incorporating some of the new features of the Z97 chipset, including future compatibility with 5th Generation Core CPUs.</p>
<div id="attachment_35568" style="width: 990px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Intel-9-Series-Chipset-Overview-9801.jpg" rel="lightbox-0"><img class="size-full wp-image-35568" src="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Intel-9-Series-Chipset-Overview-9801.jpg" alt="Intel 9 Series Chipset" width="980" height="557" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Intel 9 Series Chipset Overview</p></div>
<p>These new Devil&#8217;s Canyon CPUs are designed to slot in where the old Haswell CPUs sat in terms of price, while delivering a new level of performance on the CPU end. And yes, these new CPUs do have a 4w higher TDP at 88W vs. 84W. But in reality Devil&#8217;s Canyon is merely an overclocked version of the Core i7 4770K and Core i7 4670K. The only real differences are that the clock speeds are higher on the 4790K with the base clock being 4.0 GHz, Intel&#8217;s first chip that has all four cores running at 4 GHz stock speed. The boost clock is also 4.4 GHz versus the 4770K&#8217;s 3.9, but that&#8217;s only for a single CPU core in most cases.</p>
<div id="attachment_35566" style="width: 990px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Devils-Canyon-CPU-Feature-9801.jpg" rel="lightbox-1"><img class="size-full wp-image-35566" src="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Devils-Canyon-CPU-Feature-9801.jpg" alt="Intel Devil's Canyon" width="980" height="551" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Intel Devil&#8217;s Canyon</p></div>
<div id="attachment_35567" style="width: 990px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/New-Packaging-and-TIM1.jpg" rel="lightbox-2"><img class="size-full wp-image-35567" src="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/New-Packaging-and-TIM1.jpg" alt="Devil's Canyon Improvements" width="980" height="511" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Devil&#8217;s Canyon Improvements</p></div>
<p>As you can see above, the primary changes that Intel has made with Devil&#8217;s Canyon are seen through their decision to add more resistors on the bottom of the GPU to help smooth out power delivery to the CPU. They also changed the thermal interface material (TIM) to their new Next-Generation Polmer Thermal Interface Material. They did this because a lot of overclockers complained about the TIM in Haswell because it simply didn&#8217;t overclock as well as many had expected it to. So, in fact, Devil&#8217;s Canyon is really a re-do more than anything really and Intel is sponsoring a ton of overclocking events here at Computex in order to see how high they can get overclockers to push these new CPUs.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div id="attachment_35570" style="width: 990px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Intel-Devils-Canyon-Pricing1.jpg" rel="lightbox-3"><img class="size-full wp-image-35570" src="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Intel-Devils-Canyon-Pricing1.jpg" alt="Devil's Canyon Pricing" width="980" height="542" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Devil&#8217;s Canyon Pricing</p></div>
<p>In addition to the new Devil&#8217;s Canyon chips being supported on Z97, Intel has also made it clear that these new chips should work no problem with the previous Z87 chipset, a reversal of <a title="GDC 2014: Intel Announces Breadth of New CPUs for 2014" href="http://www.brightsideofnews.com/2014/03/20/intel-announces-breadth-of-new-cpus-for-2014/" target="_blank">what we were originally told back at GDC</a> earlier this year. Back then, we criticized Intel for forcing people into a new motherboard for no reason and it looks like they listened and most Z87 boards will probably support the Devil&#8217;s Canyon chips with a simple microcode update to the BIOS. While Devil&#8217;s Canyon isn&#8217;t necessarily much of a change for Intel in terms of architecture, it does show that they&#8217;re committed to improving and listening to consumers which is important. And if you build a Z97 system with a Devil&#8217;s Canyon chip, you can always upgrade to Broadwell when it comes out next year.</p>
<p>Now, last but not least, Intel is also announcing a Pentium Anniversary edition, which they also had pre-announced at GDC. This new processor is merely an unlocked higher clocked version of the Pentium processor designed to commemorate the processor&#8217;s 20 year anniversary and to give overclockers something to mess with and push with some overclocking to see how high they can get the CPU to go. We&#8217;ve got pricing for this new CPU below with the 1000 piece pricing being $72.</p>
<p><a href="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Intel-Pentium-Anniversary-9801.jpg" rel="lightbox-4"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-35569" src="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Intel-Pentium-Anniversary-9801.jpg" alt="" width="980" height="515" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Intel-Pentium-9801.jpg" rel="lightbox-5"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-35571" src="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Intel-Pentium-9801.jpg" alt="PowerPoint Presentation" width="980" height="437" /></a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com/2014/06/02/intel-unleashes-devils-canyon-boosts-desktop/">Intel Unleashes Devil&#039;s Canyon, Boosts the Desktop</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com">VR World</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vrworld.com/2014/06/02/intel-unleashes-devils-canyon-boosts-desktop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cdn.vrworld.com

 Served from: www.vrworld.com @ 2015-04-10 17:18:29 by W3 Total Cache -->