<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>VR World &#187; windows vista</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vrworld.com/tag/windows-vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vrworld.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 07:54:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>The History of Windows</title>
		<link>http://www.vrworld.com/2015/03/24/the-history-of-windows/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vrworld.com/2015/03/24/the-history-of-windows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Reynolds]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Gates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Ballmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 3.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 95]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 98]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows ME]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vrworld.com/?p=50703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With Windows 10 expected this summer, let’s take a look back at the consumer versions of Windows throughout the ages. </p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com/2015/03/24/the-history-of-windows/">The History of Windows</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com">VR World</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="640" height="380" src="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/6923479465_648e8a0a0b_o-e1330100346979.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="6923479465_648e8a0a0b_o-e1330100346979" /></p><p>2015 will mark the 30th anniversary of Windows, Microsoft’s (<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?cid=358464">NASDAQ: MSFT</a>) iconic operating system first launched in November 1985. 2015 will also mark the year that Windows 10 will be released, the follow-up to the critically panned Windows 8.</p>
<p>Over the last decade customer’s computing needs have shifted. The computing landscape is dramatically different in 2015 than in 2001, when Microsoft launched Windows XP its most popular operating system and considered to be the company’s best. People compute in different ways, and Microsoft now has to compete with new operating systems that have appeared in the last decade like Android in addition to longtime rival Mac OS from Apple (<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?cid=22144">NASDAQ: APPL</a>).</p>
<p>Microsoft now is at a critical juncture.The success or failure of Windows 10 will be turning point for Microsoft. The exact nature of Windows 11 will depend on whether the market embraces or rejects Windows 10. If the market embraces Windows 10, it’s very likely that the follow-up will be more of the same. A failure of Windows 10 &#8212; a repeat of Windows 8 &#8212; will force Microsoft back to the drawing board with the OS, re-imagining it from the ground up.</p>
<h2><b>Back to the beginning: DOS</b></h2>
<p>A history of Windows needs to begin with what preceded it: DOS. DOS, later known as MS-DOS, was Microsoft’s first operating system and until Windows ME the foundation of what Windows ran on.</p>
<p><a href="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/94206-Ms_Dos_1.25_1982Microsoft-11.jpg" rel="lightbox-0"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-50741" src="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/94206-Ms_Dos_1.25_1982Microsoft-11-600x450.jpg" alt="OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA" width="600" height="450" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><strong><a href="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/MS-DOS.png" rel="lightbox-1"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-50742" src="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/MS-DOS-600x375.png" alt="MS-DOS" width="600" height="375" /></a> </strong></strong></p>
<p>The birth of MS-DOS began in 1981 when Microsoft met with IBM (<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?cid=18241">NYSE: IBM</a>) to discuss making an operating system for its upcoming personal computer.</p>
<p>Microsoft already had a relationship with IBM, as it was licensing the BASIC language to IBM. The scope and complexity of creating an entire operating system was beyond Microsoft’s resources available at the time, but that didn’t stop Bill Gates: he bought the full rights to DOS from a small firm based in Washington called Seattle Computer Products for $50,000.</p>
<p>The meeting that started this deal is dramatized in the film <i>Pirates of the Silicon Valley</i>:</p>
<p><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/9nfgRf2A0Tc" width="420" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></p>
<p>Seattle Computer Products’ owner Rod Brock was unaware of the exact nature of the deal between Microsoft and IBM. However, when he discovered the profits Microsoft was making selling DOS to IBM he tried to sell the company and all of its intellectual property to one of IBM’s rivals. This led to a lawsuit between Brock and Microsoft and the two parties settled out of court for $925,000, and Microsoft confirmed its rights and license to DOS.</p>
<h2><b>The first Windows</b></h2>
<p>Microsoft announced Windows, first called Windows for DOS and known by its code name of, in 1983. It was finally released in 1985. However, it was not the first operating system with a graphical user interface. That honor goes to Apple’s Macintosh.</p>
<p><a href="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/win101logo.gif" rel="lightbox-2"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-50743" src="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/win101logo-600x375.gif" alt="win101logo" width="600" height="375" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/win_10_640-100395249-orig.jpg" rel="lightbox-3"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-50744" src="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/win_10_640-100395249-orig-600x441.jpg" alt="win_10_640-100395249-orig" width="600" height="441" /></a></p>
<p>Windows shipped with several simple programs, such as MS‑DOS file management, Paint, Windows Writer, Notepad, Calculator, and a calendar, card file, and clock.</p>
<p>While Windows was praised for helping change the paradigm of how people interact with computers, this first version of the world’s most important operating system largely stood in the shadow of Macintosh. Apple, however felt threatened and sued Microsoft in 1988 for copyright infringement, claiming that Microsoft copied the &#8220;look and feel&#8221; of its operating system.</p>
<p>However Apple itself did not invent the GUI. That honor goes to Xerox, which effectively gave it away to Apple.</p>
<p><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/TrA_lm0_ngM" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></p>
<p>Support for Windows 1.0 ended in December 2001.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com/2015/03/24/the-history-of-windows/">The History of Windows</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com">VR World</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vrworld.com/2015/03/24/the-history-of-windows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UPDATE &#8211; RUMOR: Microsoft jacks up Windows 7 prices</title>
		<link>http://www.vrworld.com/2009/02/09/microsoft-jacks-up-windows-7-prices/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vrworld.com/2009/02/09/microsoft-jacks-up-windows-7-prices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 13:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Theo Valich]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home premium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[negative reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[positive reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[starter edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ultimate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ultimate edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[w7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7 price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7 pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7 sku]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theovalich.wordpress.com/?p=1041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What is the value of positive review by professional journalists? $80-150, according to Microsoft.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com/2009/02/09/microsoft-jacks-up-windows-7-prices/">UPDATE &#8211; RUMOR: Microsoft jacks up Windows 7 prices</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com">VR World</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>German site <a href="http://www.windows-secrets.de/news/artikel/d/die-preise-der-einzelnen-windows-7-editionen.html" target="_blank">Windows Secrets claims that Microsoft has set prices for Windows 7 SKUs </a>(Stock Keeping Unit). This should be the final nail in the coffin that Windows 7 will come out in winter. My estimate is that W7 will debut in August for the Back 2 School 2009 period, not in November &#8217;09 or January &#8217;10. If we compare the launch prices for two operating systems, we can see that Microsoft significantly changed the prices when compared to Vista launch prices:</p>
<ul>
<li>W7 Starter Edition &#8211; 199.95 vs. 99.95</li>
<li>W7 Home Premium &#8211; 259.95 vs. 159.95</li>
<li>W7 Professional &#8211; 299.95 vs. 299.95 (Vista Business)</li>
<li>W7 Ultimate &#8211; 319.95 vs. 399.95</li>
</ul>
<p>If we compare the launch prices for two operating systems, we can see that Microsoft jacked up Starter Edition by $100 when compared to Vista Starter Edition, Home Premium is jacked up by the same amount. Professional (Business) Edition remained the same, while Ultimate got cheaper by 80 bucks. The differences become even more interesting if we take a look at current situation &#8211; roughly a year ago, Microsoft cut the Vista prices by as much as 20%.</p>
<p>Following is a comparison between actual prices:</p>
<ul>
<li>W7 Starter Edition &#8211; 199.95 vs. 52.99</li>
<li>W7 Home Premium &#8211; 259.95 vs. 129.95</li>
<li>W7 Professional &#8211; 299.95 vs. 299.95 (Vista Business)</li>
<li>W7 Ultimate &#8211; 319.95 vs. 319.95</li>
</ul>
<p>Now, the differences are even greater. You will pay almost $150 more for W7 Starter Edition, exactly twice the much for Home Premium (single W7 Home Premium box equals two Vista Home Premium boxes), while Professional (Business) and Ultimate remain the same.</p>
<p>Judging by what we are seeing now, the wave of positive PR should yield in additional hundreds of millions dollars, since Starter and Home Premium are most sold versions with netbooks and notebooks. This will put additional pressure on notebook manufacturers and you can expect that those manufacturers will be forced to offer cheaper components inside their computers in order to meet up for these jacked up prices. OEM pricing will differ, but don&#8217;t expect wonders.</p>
<div id="attachment_1042" style="width: 510px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img class="size-full wp-image-1042" title="w7_100usd" src="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/w7_100usd.jpg" alt="one benjamin franklin." width="500" height="211" /><p class="wp-caption-text">The value of good PR for Windows 7? One Benjamin Franklin.</p></div>
<p>If you ever wanted to know what is the value of positive reviews from journalists around the world &#8211; the answer is somewhere between $80-150 per retail box. Looking it from othe other side, this can also be interpreted into the cost of negative reviews.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE: February 9, 2009, 15:02 CET &#8211; </strong><a href="http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2009/02/rumor-pricing-for-the-windows-7-editions.ars" target="_blank">ArsTechnica posted a retraction of this rumor</a>. As usuall, I will state that this story was a rumor to begin with, and we won&#8217;t know the truth until Microsoft officialy release the prices. You can expect MSFT to disclose pricing when W7 enters RC-1 stage.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com/2009/02/09/microsoft-jacks-up-windows-7-prices/">UPDATE &#8211; RUMOR: Microsoft jacks up Windows 7 prices</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com">VR World</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vrworld.com/2009/02/09/microsoft-jacks-up-windows-7-prices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy Birthday, Microsoft Windows</title>
		<link>http://www.vrworld.com/2008/11/17/happy-birthday-microsoft-windows/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vrworld.com/2008/11/17/happy-birthday-microsoft-windows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 23:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Theo Valich]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birthday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT 3.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Win2K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Win95]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 3.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 95]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows NT 4.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows XP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WinXP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theovalich.wordpress.com/?p=434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A good friend of mine just reminded me that this November should mark the 25th anniversary of Microsoft Windows. Since this sort of news is ...</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com/2008/11/17/happy-birthday-microsoft-windows/">Happy Birthday, Microsoft Windows</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com">VR World</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good friend of mine just reminded me that this November should mark the 25th anniversary of Microsoft Windows. Since this sort of news is usually seen on timekeeping websites, I decided to take a look around and check to see if Windows did indeed turned 25, or Microsoft will have to wait until 2010 to mark the date.<br />
Well, the answer is two-fold. Microsoft Windows can be viewed as 25-year old this month, if you calculate the announcements, or in November 2010, when the company finally shipped the product. The company announced Windows 1.0 operating system in November of 1983 . At that time, the company woke up from a bad dream, since the success of MS-DOS was great, but companies like Apple, VisiOn and TopView were pushing the company around. Microsoft was nowhere near today&#8217;s strengths, and the company decided to go and work with Apple.<br />
During that time, Microsoft took a lot of ideas from Apple engineers (who then again, took those ideas from Xerox Palo Alto Research Center – aka. PARC), and found a way how to make their operating system to compete against Apple.</p>
<div id="attachment_435" style="width: 510px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/microsoft_windowsbday.jpg" rel="lightbox-0"><img class="size-full wp-image-435" title="microsoft_windowsbday" src="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/microsoft_windowsbday.jpg" alt="Windows 1.0, 3.0, 95, NT 4.0, XP, Vista, 2000 and NT 3.1" width="500" height="721" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Order clockwise: Windows 1.0, 3.0, 95, NT 4.0, XP, Vista, 2000 and NT 3.1</p></div>
<p>Windows 1.0 finally entered production in September of 1985, and first system came from NEC, shipped right in November 1985. So, Windows is either 23 or 25 years old, but anyways, I wish to congratulate Microsoft on 25th birthday of the software platform that changed the world.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com/2008/11/17/happy-birthday-microsoft-windows/">Happy Birthday, Microsoft Windows</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com">VR World</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vrworld.com/2008/11/17/happy-birthday-microsoft-windows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OCZ&#8217;s brain thingie is going 64-bit&#8230; finally</title>
		<link>http://www.vrworld.com/2008/10/14/oczs-brain-thingie-is-going-64-bit-finally/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vrworld.com/2008/10/14/oczs-brain-thingie-is-going-64-bit-finally/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Theo Valich]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[64-bit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[64-bit drivers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr. Michael Schuette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mail-in rebate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neural impulse actuator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new drivers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newegg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OCZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theovalich.wordpress.com/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When OCZ Technology launched somewhat revolutionary gaming peripheral dubbed NIA (Neural Impulse Actuator), I could only find one flaw: lack of 64-bit drivers. From personal ...</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com/2008/10/14/oczs-brain-thingie-is-going-64-bit-finally/">OCZ&#8217;s brain thingie is going 64-bit&#8230; finally</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com">VR World</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When OCZ Technology launched somewhat revolutionary gaming peripheral dubbed NIA (Neural Impulse Actuator), I could only find one flaw: lack of 64-bit drivers.<br />
From personal experience, running 32-bit Vista is nothing short of pain in that specific part of human body – I&#8217;ve been using 32-bit XP and 64-bit Vista dual boot since November 30, 2006. Yes, through all the horrid moments of not having Vista drivers for 8800GTX until late Q1&#8217;07.</p>
<div id="attachment_34" style="width: 510px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/nia_after2hrs.jpg" rel="lightbox-0"><img class="size-full wp-image-34" title="nia_after2hrs" src="http://cdn.vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/nia_after2hrs.jpg" alt="The device is so good that it leaves a lasting impression... but you have to use it to build your profile. It only gets better as the time passes by..." width="500" height="210" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The device is so good that it leaves a lasting impression... but you have to use it to build your profile. It only gets better as the time passes by...</p></div>
<p>Starting today, NIA finally has 64-bit driver support. According to Dr. Michael Schuette, &#8220;The migration to the Vista 64 environment with the unified ver. 2.0 software suite required a complete recoding of the human interface device library&#8221;. The company decided to add the 64-bit executable into brand new unified driver package, supporting 32-bit Windows XP and both versions of Vista.<br />
You can download drivers from here. Given the fact that my old review never saw the light of day on previous publications, I am working on a new review, hopefully done by next week.<br />
If you have NIA device, <a title="NIA driver page" href="http://www.ocztechnology.com/drivers/OCZ_Neural_Impulse_Actuator/" target="_blank">you can grab the drivers here</a>. If you don&#8217;t have the device, I wholeheartedly advise you to reconsider your shopping list &#8211; the device now sells for only $116.99 (after  $20.00 MIR) over at <a title="Newegg's sale of NIA for $116" href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16826100006&amp;Tpk=ocz%20nia" target="_blank">Newegg</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com/2008/10/14/oczs-brain-thingie-is-going-64-bit-finally/">OCZ&#8217;s brain thingie is going 64-bit&#8230; finally</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vrworld.com">VR World</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vrworld.com/2008/10/14/oczs-brain-thingie-is-going-64-bit-finally/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cdn.vrworld.com

 Served from: www.vrworld.com @ 2015-04-10 16:32:15 by W3 Total Cache -->